I’ve said for years that if the folks at Canonical want to get serious traction with Ubuntu and truly compete with the likes of Microsoft and Apple, they need to come out with their own line of hardware. Face it, the big OEMs still show little to no interest in pre-installed anything other than Windows and most home computer users aren’t ever going to start installing their own operating systems.
Consumers generally just want to open the box and start computing. They’re not interested in what’s under the hood. As for the enterprise, their server needs are either being met by Red Hat, its clone CentOS, or they’re rolling their own in-house, starting with a “pure” Linux like Debian or Slackware.
What I’m trying to say is something we all already know. No company is ever going to get rule-the-world traction just by distributing their flavor of Linux, no matter how good it is–especially in consumer space. In the enterprise, you can point to Red Hat all you want, but that well isn’t big enough for two horses to drink from, even with IBM’s help.
But a good Linux distro like Ubuntu, one that’s been well-engineered to be easy to use and is at least as polished and free of bugs as Apple and Microsoft products, can succeed and become a major competitor. All it needs to do is follow the old-fashioned model of offering their software on their own hardware. Once this was how all computer companies worked. These days this is known as the Apple approach.
I’ve written about this before. For a long time I’ve thought this is what Shuttleworth & Company has in mind for Ubuntu. They’ve spent too much time, effort and money developing a highly polished product to just offer it up and hope enough people will bite and buy support contracts to keep them afloat. I’ve listened to Shuttleworth and his crew speak. They’re not stupid.
After Wednesday’s “Ubuntu Phone” announcement, I’m more convinced than ever that a grand scheme is in play that’s only being hinted at and that this new mobile component has something to do with it.
When Canonical’s phone announcement was first made, it seemed from press reports that the company was coming out with a completely different operating system for the phone–something akin to what Redmond has done with the Windows Phone 7 and 8 implementations. Indeed, from looking at all the news reports last week, it looked like we’d be seeing something called “Ubuntu Phone OS,” a separate release from Ubuntu’s desktop and server offerings.
From the stories I was seeing, it was even unclear whether this release would be available to the public to install on existing phones. Perhaps it would only be available pre-installed and us mortals could only get it from our not-so-friendly and not-so-favorite wireless providers.
This weekend, Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols over at ZDNet straightened us out:
“…unlike Microsoft with Windows RT for ARM-powered devices and … Windows Phone 8 for smartphones, there will be no separate version for each device. If all goes as planned when Ubuntu 14.04 rolls out in April 2014 one Ubuntu image will support smartphones, smart TVs, and computers.”
In other words, the same processor architecture specific image used to install Ubuntu on a desktop or laptop will be used for installation on a smartphone. Not only is this different from any phone OS we’ve seen before, the reason behind it is also different. The Ubuntu phone will have a feature set that’s very mobile centric, with navigation through hand gestures and such, but when the device is docked to a monitor and full-sized keyboard, it will switch to something like “desktop mode” and act exactly like desktop Ubuntu.
In my estimation, this is a very smart move; one that leads me to believe Ubuntu perhaps has plans to come out with a line of equipment that tightly integrates the Ubuntu mobile experience with the desktop or workstation. If they’re not planning on doing this on their own branded hardware, they’re certainly going to try to sell this to an OEM that wants to elevate itself from the Android mainstream crowd.
Now, I’ve watched enough episodes of Shark Tank to know this will be a hard sell. And even if they’re successful in selling the concept to an OEM, it’ll be difficult to monetize, given the copyleft licensing of GNU/Linux.
It’ll be easier for the Ubuntu folks to come out with the equipment and take it to market themselves, a strategy that will have long-term advantages if they’re successful. For one thing, they’ll be able to make sure that it’s done right. No more sloppy installations that don’t work out-of-the-box without some tinkering with configurations files, as we’ve seen with most Linux offerings from the likes of Dell.
The beauty here is they won’t need to make their own computer, or even have computers made specifically for them as Apple does. They’ll be able to order phones, desktops and laptops that are already being manufactured and slap the Ubuntu brand on them. In no time at all they can have phones, docking stations, computers, laptops–a whole integrated offering–ready to go. At that point, all they’ll have to do is open up some storefronts, call them Ubuntu Shacks or something, and they’re ready to go.
By the time they do this, they might already have traction in the enterprise, where the only hardware they’ll need to offer are perhaps phones and docking stations. With the right VAR guys working for them, they might be able to have a boatload of installations presold long before they have the software ready for release.
As unlikely as this may seem, it’s all extremely doable, especially if they start making marketing moves in places like China, India and in their own South African backyard, places where there is strong demand for less expensive alternatives to Microsoft and Apple. With a quality product, they wouldn’t need to position themselves as a low-cost alternative for long. Very quickly they could hand that job to Microsoft and start going eye to eye with Apple for the upscale market.
A free and open source Linux operating system on a cell phone, that’s tightly integrated to synch with a free and open source Linux operating system pre-installed on traditional devices, would be a winner in my estimation. I’m not saying it’s going to happen, but it could–and I’m beginning to suspect that’s exactly what Mark Shuttleworth has in mind.
What do you think? Am I nuts? Am I just another daydreaming Penguinista? Or could Ubuntu be getting ready to make an unprecedented move?
Latest posts by Christine Hall (see all)
- ‘Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace’ Turns 20, Opera Fetches $1.2 Billion & More… - February 12, 2016
- SCO v. IBM: Judge Rules for IBM in Interferance Claims - February 10, 2016
- India Shuts Down Zuckerberg’s ‘Free Basics’ - February 9, 2016