DuckDuckGo Ups Ante: Gives $300K to 'Raise the Standard of Trust'
For the seventh year in a row, the search engine that promises not to stalk your online moves puts its money where its mouth is, this year by donating $300,000 to organizations that
System76 Saying Goodbye to Bland Design
Considering that System76 chose to unveil its new design plans to The Linux Gamer -- no invite went to FOSS Force, BTW -- we can't help but wonder if a System76 Steam Machine isn't in the works.

The Screening
The Great Debian Iceweasel/Icedove Saga Comes to an End
Now that Thunderbird is back in the Debian repositories, the decade long dispute that led to all Mozilla products in Debian being rebranded has ended.



The hatchet is finally completely
Back Yard Linux
It's not as lonely being a Linux user as it once was. These days you're liable to find people throughout your neighborhood using Linux.



My how times have changed.

It wasn't long ago that Linux
No, Evil Hackers Aren't After You
Humankind has outgrown the need to have monsters hiding under our beds. Now we let them hide in our phones, computers and microwave ovens.

Roblimo's Hideaway



OMG! I think I see a giant camera lens on
Should the U.S. Army Have Its Own Open Source License?
Should the U.S. armed forces begin releasing software under an OSI approved open source license rather than as public domain?

Roblimo's Hideaway



This question has generated many pixels'
GitHub CEO Chris Wanstrath on Open Source
Did you know that the software Stephen Hawking uses to speak is open source and that it's available on GitHub? Neither did we.

The Screening Room




At the Computer History museum, GitHub CEO Chris
April 17th, 2013

Obama Threatens Veto Against CISPA Unless Changed

Online privacy advocates finally got what they’ve been asking for when President Obama yesterday threatened to veto the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) if congress doesn’t amend it to include more protections of privacy and civil liberties. The administration began signalling displeasure with the bill last Thursday when Caitlin Hayden, of the National Security Council, indicated the President might not support the measure as worded, after it was approved by the U.S. House Intelligence Committee.

While that statement didn’t carry a specific veto threat, Hayden was clear in her message that the President wanted to support some form of CISPA, but that the bill did not yet contain enough privacy and civil liberty protections:

“We continue to believe that information sharing improvements are essential to effective legislation, but they must include privacy and civil liberties protections, reinforce the roles of civilian and intelligence agencies, and include targeted liability protections. &#8230 Further, we believe the adopted committee amendments reflect a good faith-effort to incorporate some of the Administration’s important substantive concerns, but we do not believe these changes have addressed some outstanding fundamental priorities.”

Yesterday’s “Statement of Administration Policy” issued by the Office of Management and Budget, was very clear that the veto is on the table for possible use if the bill passes as it’s now written:

“The Administration still seeks additional improvements and if the bill, as currently crafted, were presented to the President, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.”

The administration has issues with the bill in addition to privacy and civil liberty concerns. They would like to see legal cases involving misuse of the law handled by civilian rather than military courts as now stipulated. In addition, they want the exemptions from legal liability the law would give to companies that share information with government agencies to be made much narrower.

The veto threat was openly welcomed by privacy proponents. David Segal, executive director of Demand Progress, issued a statement saying:

“As technology changes we must not allow our constitutional protections to be eviscerated. CISPA represents a threat to the freedom of all Americans who believe in the value of the Bill of Rights. We are heartened that President Obama has heard our call and acted in the best interest of the American people.”

[yop_poll id=”7″]

CISPA paves the way for the sharing of Internet traffic information between the U.S. government and technology companies such as service providers. The bill’s stated purpose is to aid federal investigations into cyber threats and to ensure the security of networks against cyber attacks. Written into the law are provisions to offer tech companies immunity from legal ramifications when they cooperate with government agencies. The bill is currently scheduled for a vote either today or tomorrow in the House of Representatives.

Unfortunately, we’ve been where we are now before. Last year a similar bill passed the House on April 26, even after the President had threatened a veto, but was not passed by the Senate.

The following two tabs change content below.
Christine Hall has been a journalist since 1971. In 2001, she began writing a weekly consumer computer column and started covering Linux and FOSS in 2002 after making the switch to GNU/Linux. Follow her on Twitter: @BrideOfLinux

4 comments to Obama Threatens Veto Against CISPA Unless Changed

  • djohnston

    And everyone knows that Obama always keeps his promises, right?

  • skpg

    Obama being a hypocrite again. Wasn’t it the Obama administration along with the MPAA/RIAA that pushed for the six-strike policy that forced ISPS to penalize the consumers for downloading copyrighted material?

  • […] Obama Threatens Veto Against CISPA Unless Changed Online privacy advocates finally got what they’ve been asking for when President Obama yesterday threatened to veto the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) if congress doesn’t amend it to include more protections of privacy and civil liberties. The administration began signalling displeasure with the bill last Thursday when Caitlin Hayden, of the National Security Council, indicated the President might not support the measure as worded, after it was approved by the U.S. House Intelligence Committee. […]

  • Dont buy it, he will promise to veto it only to change his mind when it matters. Sickening to think where this is headed, goodbye constitutional rights!